In a startling discovery that raises fundamental questions about human behavior, researchers at the University of Virginia School of Medicine have determined that the immune system directly affects – and even controls – creatures’ social behavior, such as their desire to interact with others. So could immune system problems contribute to an inability to have normal social interactions? The answer appears to be yes, and that finding could have great implications for neurological conditions such as autism-spectrum disorders and schizophrenia.

“The brain and the adaptive immune system were thought to be isolated from each other, and any immune activity in the brain was perceived as sign of a pathology. And now, not only are we showing that they are closely interacting, but some of our behavior traits might have evolved because of our immune response to pathogens,” explained Jonathan Kipnis, PhD, chairman of UVA’s Department of Neuroscience. “It’s crazy, but maybe we are just multicellular battlefields for two ancient forces: pathogens and the immune system. Part of our personality may actually be dictated by the immune system.”

It was only last year that Kipnis, the director of UVA’s Center for Brain Immunology and Glia, and his team discovered that meningeal vessels directly link the brain with the lymphatic system. That overturned decades of textbook teaching that the brain was “immune privileged,” lacking a direct connection to the immune system. The discovery opened the door for entirely new ways of thinking about how the brain and the immune system interact.

The follow-up finding is equally illuminating, shedding light on both the workings of the brain and on evolution itself. The relationship between people and pathogens, the researchers suggest, could have directly affected the development of our social behavior, allowing us to engage in the social interactions necessary for the survival of the species while developing ways for our immune systems to protect us from the diseases that accompany those interactions. Social behavior is, of course, in the interest of pathogens, as it allows them to spread.

The UVA researchers have shown that a specific immune molecule, interferon gamma, seems to be critical for social behavior and that a variety of creatures, such as flies, zebrafish, mice and rats, activate interferon gamma responses when they are social. Normally, this molecule is produced by the immune system in response to bacteria, viruses or parasites. Blocking the molecule in mice using genetic modification made regions of the brain hyperactive, causing the mice to become less social. Restoring the molecule restored the brain connectivity and behavior to normal. In a paper outlining their findings, the researchers note the immune molecule plays a “profound role in maintaining proper social function.”

Researchers discuss the shocking finding that the immune system can control social behavior. The discovery could have enormous implications for conditions such autism-spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. Credit: Harry Moxley / UVA School of Medicine

“It’s extremely critical for an organism to be social for the survival of the species. It’s important for foraging, sexual reproduction, gathering, hunting,” said Anthony J. Filiano, PhD, Hartwell postdoctoral fellow in the Kipnis lab and lead author of the study. “So the hypothesis is that when organisms come together, you have a higher propensity to spread infection. So you need to be social, but [in doing so] you have a higher chance of spreading pathogens. The idea is that interferon gamma, in evolution, has been used as a more efficient way to both boost social behavior while boosting an anti-pathogen response.”

Understanding the Implications

The researchers note that a malfunctioning immune system may be responsible for “social deficits in numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders.” But exactly what this might mean for autism and other specific conditions requires further investigation. It is unlikely that any one molecule will be responsible for disease or the key to a cure, the researchers believe; instead, the causes are likely to be much more complex. But the discovery that the immune system – and possibly germs, by extension – can control our interactions raises many exciting avenues for scientists to explore, both in terms of battling neurological disorders and understanding human behavior.

“Immune molecules are actually defining how the brain is functioning. So, what is the overall impact of the immune system on our brain development and function?” Kipnis said. “I think the philosophical aspects of this work are very interesting, but it also has potentially very important clinical implications.”

Kipnis and his team worked closely with UVA’s Department of Pharmacology and the group of Vladimir Litvak, PhD, at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. Litvak’s team developed a computational approach to investigate the complex dialogue between immune signaling and brain function in health and disease. “Using this approach we predicted a role for interferon gamma, an important cytokine secreted by T lymphocytes, in promoting social brain functions,” Litvak said. “Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of social dysfunction in neurological disorders, such as autism and schizophrenia, and may open new avenues for therapeutic approaches.”

Explore further: Scientists discover trigger for protective immune response to spinal cord injuries

More information: Anthony J. Filiano et al, Unexpected role of interferon-γ in regulating neuronal connectivity and social behaviour, Nature (2016). DOI: 10.1038/nature18626

Journal reference:

Provided by: University of Virginia Health System


1.Derecki, N. C. et al. Regulation of learning and memory by meningeal immunity: a key role for IL-4. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1067–1080 (2010) CAS

2.Bourke, A. F. Hamilton’s rule and the causes of social evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130362 (2014)

3.Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P. & Cacioppo, J. T. Toward a neurology of loneliness. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1464–1504 (2014)

4.Kennedy, D. P. & Adolphs, R. The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 559–572 (2012)

5.Ashwood, P. et al. Altered T cell responses in children with autism. Brain Behav. Immun. 25, 840–849 (2011) CAS

6.Gupta, S., Aggarwal, S., Rashanravan, B. & Lee, T. Th1- and Th2-like cytokines in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in autism. J. Neuroimmunol. 85, 106–109 (1998) CAS

7.Waisman, A., Liblau, R. S. & Becher, B. Innate and adaptive immune responses in the CNS. Lancet Neurol. 14, 945–955 (2015)

8.Moy, S. S. et al. Sociability and preference for social novelty in five inbred strains: an approach to assess autistic-like behavior in mice. Genes Brain Behav. 3, 287–302 (2004) CAS

9.Silverman, J. L., Yang, M., Lord, C. & Crawley, J. N. Behavioural phenotyping assays for mouse models of autism. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11, 490–502 (2010)

10.Nelson, S. B. & Valakh, V. Excitatory/inhibitory balance and circuit homeostasis in autism spectrum disorders. Neuron 87, 684–698 (2015) CAS

11.Supekar, K. et al. Brain hyperconnectivity in children with autism and its links to social deficits. Cell Reports 5, 738–747 (2013) CAS

12.Zhan, Y. et al. Deficient neuron-microglia signaling results in impaired functional brain connectivity and social behavior. Nature Neurosci. 17, 400–406 (2014)

13.Shen, H. H. Core concept: resting-state connectivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14115–14116 (2015)

14.Brynskikh, A., Warren, T., Zhu, J. & Kipnis, J. Adaptive immunity affects learning behavior in mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 22, 861–869 (2008) CAS

15.Yednock, T. A. et al. Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against α4β1 integrin. Nature 356, 63–66 (1992) CAS

16.Kunis, G. et al. IFN-γ-dependent activation of the brain’s choroid plexus for CNS immune surveillance and repair. Brain 136, 3427–3440 (2013)

17.Tsuda, M. et al. IFN-γ receptor signaling mediates spinal microglia activation driving neuropathic pain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8032–8037 (2009)

18.Prieto, J. J., Peterson, B. A. & Winer, J. A. Morphology and spatial distribution of GABAergic neurons in cat primary auditory cortex (AI). J. Comp. Neurol. 344, 349–382 (1994)

19.Oláh, S. et al. Regulation of cortical microcircuits by unitary GABA-mediated volume transmission. Nature 461, 1278–1281 (2009) CAS

20.Han, S., Tai, C., Jones, C. J., Scheuer, T. & Catterall, W. A. Enhancement of inhibitory neurotransmission by GABAA receptors having α2,3-subunits ameliorates behavioral deficits in a mouse model of autism. Neuron 81, 1282–1289 (2014) CAS

21.Wang, L., Dankert, H., Perona, P. & Anderson, D. J. A common genetic target for environmental and heritable influences on aggressiveness in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5657–5663 (2008) CAS

22.Datwani, A. et al. Classical MHCI molecules regulate retinogeniculate refinement and limit ocular dominance plasticity. Neuron 64, 463–470 (2009) CAS

23.Djurc, M. et al. PirB regulates a structural substrate for cortical plasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20771–20776 (2013) CAS

24.Steinman, L. Inflammatory cytokines at the summits of pathological signal cascades in brain diseases. Sci. Signal. 6, pe3 (2013)

25.Smith, L. K. et al. β2-microglobulin is a systemic pro-aging factor that impairs cognitive function and neurogenesis. Nature Med. 21, 932–937 (2015)

26.Baruch, K. et al. Aging-induced type I interferon response at the choroid plexus negatively affects brain function. Science 346, 89–93 (2014) CAS

27.McCusker, R. H. & Kelley, K. W. Immune-neural connections: how the immune system’s response to infectious agents influences behavior. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 84–98 (2013) CAS

28.Scholz, J. & Woolf, C. J. The neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and glia. Nature Neurosci. 10, 1361–1368 (2007)

29.Bhat, R. et al. Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2580–2585 (2010)

30.López-Muñoz, A. et al. Evolutionary conserved pro-inflammatory and antigen presentation functions of zebrafish IFNγ revealed by transcriptomic and functional analysis. Mol. Immunol. 48, 1073–1083 (2011)

31.Filiano, A. J. et al. Dissociation of frontotemporal dementia-related deficits and neuroinflammation in progranulin haploinsufficient mice. J. Neurosci. 33, 5352–5361 (2013) CAS

32.Johnson, G. A. et al. Waxholm space: an image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research. Neuroimage 53, 365–372 (2010)

33.Avants, B. B. et al. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 54, 2033–2044 (2011)

34.Avants, B. B. et al. The pediatric template of brain perfusion. Sci. Data 2, 150003 (2015)

35.Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154 (2012)