-
Key Findings about San Mateo community in areas of health and other aspects
- Source: http://www.dignityhealth.org/stellent/groups/public/@xinternet_con_sys/documents/webcontent/235046.pdf
- San Mateo County is among the most culturally and ethnically diverse counties.
- Asian and Hispanic residents, along with seniors, are expected to continue to become increasingly greater proportions of the population. We are not adequately prepared for this enormous demographic shift.
- There are two San Mateo Counties: one for the economic “haves” and one for the economic “have nots.” The gap between these two is growing.
- The actual causes of premature death are rooted in behavior, and it is estimated that as many as 50% of premature deaths are due to health risk behaviors such as tobacco use, poor diet, a lack of exercise, alcohol use, etc. Despite this, the vast majority of our community does not exhibit the most basic healthy behaviors.
- Individual health behaviors are deeply influenced by public policy and place (i.e., neighborhood conditions) to a far greater degree than we recognize. The health of San Mateo County can be improved through a greater focus by all organizations on public policy changes and place-based strategies.
- Quality health care services in the county are, for the most part, not a problem. Access and affordability are a significant problem. The lack of a comprehensive healthcare “system” is a failing, unsustainable model.
- More than one out of four San Mateo County adults believe access to mental health, substance abuse, and dental services in the county are “fair” or “poor.”
- The Internet is likely to replace physicians in the near future as the place where most people get most of their healthcare information.
- The proportion of births with adequate prenatal care has risen steadily among Black and Hispanic women, lessening the racial health disparities that have persisted in prenatal.
- The Internet is likely to replace physicians in the near future as the place where most people get most of their healthcare information.
- More than one out of four San Mateo County adults believe access to mental health, substance abuse, and dental services in the county are “fair” or “poor.”
- Quality health care services in the county are, for the most part, not a problem. Access and affordability are a significant problem. The lack of a comprehensive healthcare “system” is a failing, unsustainable model.
- Individual health behaviors are deeply influenced by public policy and place (i.e., neighborhood conditions) to a far greater degree than we recognize. The health of San Mateo County can be improved through a greater focus by all organizations on public policy changes and place-based strategies.
- The actual causes of premature death are rooted in behavior, and it is estimated that as many as 50% of premature deaths are due to health risk behaviors such as tobacco use, poor diet, a lack of exercise, alcohol use, etc. Despite this, the vast majority of our community does not exhibit the most basic healthy behaviors.
- There are two San Mateo Counties: one for the economic “haves” and one for the economic “have nots.” The gap between these two is growing.
-
- The rise in C-section rates is a disturbing trend. [Connie: I can provide my childbirth ebook for free for pregnant women]
- Our children are not doing much better than adults in exhibiting healthy behaviors. This will severely impact their future health.
- Adolescents engage in a variety of risky behaviors such as alcohol and drug use, tobacco use, violence, and sexual behavior. It is important to encourage in our children and adolescents those assets which will deter harmful behaviors and promote healthy
-
- Key adolescent assets where additional effort should be placed are: 1) increasing the amount of sustained caring and supportive adult/youth relationships; and 2) increasing meaningful participation of youth in community activities.
- The proportion of adults aged 60 and older is expected to roughly double over the next four decades, and Hispanics and Asians are projected to increase their representation considerably in the older population. As the fastest-growing population segment, the health and social needs of older adults require increasing attention.
- Falls are a key issue leading to hospitalization, loss of independence, and death among
- The proportion of adults aged 60 and older is expected to roughly double over the next four decades, and Hispanics and Asians are projected to increase their representation considerably in the older population. As the fastest-growing population segment, the health and social needs of older adults require increasing attention.
- Key adolescent assets where additional effort should be placed are: 1) increasing the amount of sustained caring and supportive adult/youth relationships; and 2) increasing meaningful participation of youth in community activities.
- More resources should be directed toward this preventable condition. [Connie: affordable caregiving services to our older adults must be identified, Motherhealth Inc fee on caregiving is around $15 per hr and up that still cannot be afforded by others]
- Looking at mortality rates, we are healthier now than any time in the past.
- Cancers are a leading cause of death in San Mateo County. Area incidence and mortality rates vary dramatically by race/ethnicity.
- Few residents consume adequate amounts of fruits/vegetables, however, this appears to be slowly improving. Access to fresh fruits and vegetables is still an issue in some areas.
- Heart disease and stroke death rates continue to decline, while reported prevalence of high blood pressure and high blood cholesterol continues to rise.
- Since 1998, there have been significant increases in the prevalence of asthma, chronic lung disease and diabetes among San Mateo County adults.
- After decreasing for several years, we are beginning to see a disturbing rise in both gonorrhea and chlamydia.
- Poisonings (including drug overdoses), firearms and motor vehicle accidents are the leading causes of injury deaths in San Mateo County.
- Substance use (alcohol, tobacco and other drugs) is one of the most serious threats to the health of our community. Substance use carries a significant social impact, contributing to such social conditions as homelessness, violence, poverty and disease. Youth substance use is a particular concern.
- Binge drinking among young adults, especially males aged 18 to 24, has increased significantly over the last several years.
- Depression, isolation and loneliness are prevalent in San Mateo County. Mental health services to deal with depression are inadequate, as are the variety of community structures needed to deal with loneliness and isolation.
- While San Mateo County excels by most conventional measures, there are subgroups within the population who do not share the wealth. The prosperity of recent years has led to an extremely high cost of living that significantly impacts low- and middle-income
- Depression, isolation and loneliness are prevalent in San Mateo County. Mental health services to deal with depression are inadequate, as are the variety of community structures needed to deal with loneliness and isolation.
- Binge drinking among young adults, especially males aged 18 to 24, has increased significantly over the last several years.
- Substance use (alcohol, tobacco and other drugs) is one of the most serious threats to the health of our community. Substance use carries a significant social impact, contributing to such social conditions as homelessness, violence, poverty and disease. Youth substance use is a particular concern.
- Poisonings (including drug overdoses), firearms and motor vehicle accidents are the leading causes of injury deaths in San Mateo County.
- After decreasing for several years, we are beginning to see a disturbing rise in both gonorrhea and chlamydia.
- Since 1998, there have been significant increases in the prevalence of asthma, chronic lung disease and diabetes among San Mateo County adults.
- Heart disease and stroke death rates continue to decline, while reported prevalence of high blood pressure and high blood cholesterol continues to rise.
- Few residents consume adequate amounts of fruits/vegetables, however, this appears to be slowly improving. Access to fresh fruits and vegetables is still an issue in some areas.
-
- A minimum-wage income in San Mateo County would be entirely consumed by child care costs for one infant. [Connie: Subsidized child care costs is needed?]
- Nearly a third of youth aged 13 to 17 have no supervision after school [Connie: Need for free after school programs and food for the young to learn more and be supervised while parents are taking two jobs to survive the high housing costs].
- Disparities in childhood opportunities lead to lifelong and even multi-generational disparities in health and economic success. There is a need to increase the access of high quality comprehensive early childhood education and care to low-income families and families of color.
- More than one out of four Black and Hispanic respondents believe racial and cultural tolerance in San Mateo County is “fair” or “poor,” and these proportions are increasing.
- A minimum-wage income in San Mateo County would be entirely consumed by child care costs for one infant. [Connie: Subsidized child care costs is needed?]
- While public transit use is up, it remains underutilized. We should implement appropriate incentives to encourage use of public transportation.
- ———–
- Comments: We all have to strive for equality and access to health, education, affordable housing and other services to all residents. Promote local businessess and provide for vocational training for our high school students to have the skills before graduation to be a responsible adult. Connie Dello Buono 408-854-1883 motherhealth@gmail.com health and finance blogger
Estate taxes, worth $2.5M or more, between 40-86 yr old
Are you:
- using an old, traditional methods of funding your estate taxes and want to reduce out of pocket costs
- interested in leveraging existing assets to generate large amounts tax free income through the use of premium financing
- looking for a solution for your estate planning needs or hate taxes
Have a chat with our sr investment advisor and learn about premium financing if your worth is at least $2.5M and age between 40 -86 yr old
Contact Connie Dello Buono to arrange a chat with our sr investment advisor/financial planner at Harding Financial. Or email at motherhealth@gmail.com
Genetic Testing
Genetic Testing
- Genomic Tests and Family History by Levels of Evidence
The CDC Office of Public Health Genomics ranks the following list for levels of evidence of genomic tests and family health history in practice . This approach was based on a paper by Khoury
and updated in accordance with criteria presented by a 2014 paper in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
. The criteria are shown in the following figure to provide additional information to our readers.This list is updated on an ongoing basis andprovided only for informational purposes to researchers, healthcare providers, public health programs and others.
Green
- FDA label requires use of test to inform choice or dose of a drug
- CMS covers testing
- Clinical practice guidelines based on systematic review supports testing
Yellow
- FDA label mentions biomarkers*
- CMS coverage with evidence development
- Clinical practice guideline, not based on systematic review, supports use of test
- Clinical practice guideline finds insufficient evidence but does not discourage use of test
- Systematic review, without clinical practice guideline, supports use of test
- Systematic review finds insufficient evidence but does not discourage use of test
- Clinical practice guideline recommends dosage adjustment, but does not address testing
Red
- FDA label cautions against use
- CMS decision against coverage
- Clinical practice guideline recommends against use of test
- Clinical practice guideline finds insufficient evidence and discourages use of test
- Systematic review recommends against use
- Systematic review finds insufficient evidence and discourages use
- Evidence available only from published studies without systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines, FDA label or CMS labels coverage decision
*Can be reassigned to Green of Red of one or more conditions in these categories apply
Tier 1/Green category: represents genomic and family health history applications which have a base of synthesized evidence supporting implementation into practice.
| Gene, Gene/Drug, Test, or Family History | Disorder/Indication | Use* | Synthesized Evidence Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer—Breast/Ovarian | |||
| family history of breast/ovarian or other types of BRCA-related cancer | hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in women | risk prediction for referral for BRCA genetic counseling | USPSTF NCCN Guideline NCCN Task Force |
| first-degree family history of breast cancer | chemoprevention of breast cancer | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history of known breast/ovarian cancer with deleterious BRCA mutation | hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in women | risk prediction; referral to counseling for BRCA genetic testing | USPSTF |
| HER2/trastuzumab | invasive breast cancer | PGx | NICE ASCO FDA-Device FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HER2/pertuzumab | invasive breast cancer | PGx | FDA-Device FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HER2/ado-trastuzumab emtansine | metastatic breast cancer | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HER2/everolimus | advanced HR+ HER2- breast cancer | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HER2/lapatinib (in combination with capecitabine or letrozole) | advanced or metastatic breast cancer | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HER2 | invasive breast cancer | PGx | ASCO/CAP NICE |
| ER /fulvestrant | metastatic breast cancer | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| ER/exemestane | ER+ early breast cancer | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information NICE |
| ER/anastrozole or letrozole | ER+ early invasive breast cancer | PGx | NICE |
| ER and PgR | invasive breast cancer, breast cancer recurrences | PGx | ASCO/CAP NCCN Task Force |
| Oncotype DX® adjuvant chemotherapy | ER+/LN-/HER2- breast cancer, intermediate risk of recurrence | prognostic; guiding decision-making: adjuvant chemotherapy | NICE NCCN Task Force |
| Cancer—Colorectal | |||
| Testing for Lynch syndrome | newly diagnosed colorectal cancer | screening, cascade testing of relatives | EGAPP (2009) |
| Testing for Lynch syndrome | known Lynch syndrome in family | diagnostic, screening | EGAPP (2009)
NCCN |
| KRAS/cetuximab, panitumumab | metastatic colorectal cancer | PGx | EGAPP NCCN ASCO FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5 or CEA) | invasive colorectal cancer | prognostic | ASCO/CAP NCCN NCCN Task Force |
| Cancer—Gastric | |||
| HER2/trastuzumab | gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma | PGx | FDA-Device FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| c-Kit protein (CD 117)/imatinib | gastrointestinal stromal tumors | PGx | FDA-Device FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Cancer—Leukemia/lymphoma | |||
| Philadelphia chromosome, T315I mutation/dasatinib | chronic myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia | PGx; diagnostic | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Philadelphia chromosome/imatinib | chronic myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia | PGx; diagnostic | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Philadelphia chromosome/bosutinib | chronic myelogenous leukemia | PGx; diagnostic | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Philadelphia chromosome/nilotinib | chronic myeloid leukemia | PGx; diagnostic | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| PML/RARα/tretinoin | acute promyelocytic leukemia | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| PML/RARα/arsenic trioxide | acute promyelocytic leukemia | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| PDGFRB/imatinib | myelodysplastic/ myeloproliferative diseases | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CD25/denileukin diftitox | persistent or recurrent cutaneous T-cell lymphoma | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CD20/tositumomab | Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/rasburicase | leukemia, lymphoma, solid tumor malignancies | PGx, pretreatment screening in patients at higher risk for G6PD deficiency (e.g., African or Mediterranean ancestry) | FDA-PGx Drug Information CPIC |
| Chromosome 5q deletion/lenalidomide | transfusion-dependent anemia due to low-or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a deletion 5q | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Cancer—Lung | |||
| EGFR (exon 19 deletions and exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations)/afatinib | metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer | PGx | FDA-Device FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| EGFR (exon 19 deletions and exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations)/erlotinib | locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer | PGx | NICE NCCN Task Force FDA-Device FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| ALK gene rearrangement/crizotinib | non-small cell lung cancer | PGx | FDA-Device FDA-PGx Drug Information NCCN Task Force |
| Cancer—Melanoma | |||
| BRAF V600E/K /trametinib | unresectable or metastatic melanoma | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information FDA-Device |
| BRAF V600E/dabrafenib | unresectable or metastatic melanoma | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information FDA-Device |
| BRAFV600E/vemurafenib | unresectable or metastatic melanoma | PGx | NICE FDA-PGx Drug Information FDA-Device |
| Cardiovascular disease | |||
| DNA testing and LDL-C concentration measurement | familial hypercholesterolemia | cascade testing of relatives of people diagnosed with FH | NICE |
| family history of cardiovascular disease before age 50 years in male relatives and age 60 years in female relatives | cholesterol screening | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| Infectious disease | |||
| HLA-B*5701/abacavir | HIV | PGx | DHHS Advisory Committee CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CCR5-tropic HIV-1 /maraviroc | HIV | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information HHS Panel |
| Other | |||
| CFTR (G551D)/ivacaftor | cystic fibrosis | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HLA-B*1502/carbamazepine | epilepsy, trigeminal neuralgia; pretreatment screening for those with ancestry in populations genetically at-risk for certain serious dermatologic reactions | PGx, pretreatment screening for those with ancestry in populations genetically at-risk for certain serious dermatologic reactions | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/pimozide | Tourette’s disorder | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/tetrabenazine | chorea associated with Huntington’s disease | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/pegloticase | chronic gout in adults refractory to conventional therapy | PGx, pretreatment screening in patients at higher risk for G6PD deficiency (e.g., African or Mediterranean ancestry) | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Parental history of hip fracture | osteoporosis screening in women | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history, especially siblings, with hereditary hemochromatosis | hereditary hemochromatosis | risk prediction; counseling for genetic testing among asymptomatic people | USPSTF |
| newborn screening panel | 31 core conditions | screening | SACHDNC |
*Pharmacogenomic applications have been classified in the Use column as either PGx (which may relate to drug choice, prevention of adverse events, or other uses of the information gained through testing), or PGx-dose (when specific dosing-related guidance is provided, or mention of a potential effect on dose is noted in the evidence sources cited). Additional Use categories include: screening, cascade testing, risk prediction, diagnostic, and prognostic.
Source Abbreviations: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC), US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Tier 2/Yellow category: represents genomic and family health history applications have synthesized evidence that is insufficient to support routine implementation in practice; however, existing evidence may provide information for informed decision making by providers and patients.
| Gene, Gene/Drug, Test, or Family History | Disorder/Indication | Use* | Synthesized Evidence Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer—Breast | |||
| gene expression profiles | breast cancer | Recurrence: risk prediction; prognostic | EGAPP |
| ER-alpha and PgR status/ER-alpha (ESR1)-modulating agents | invasive breast cancer and breast cancer | PGx – recurrence risk prediction; prognostic | NCCN Task Force NCCN Task Force ASCO/CAP |
| CYP2D6/tamoxifen | risk for primary breast cancer or breast cancer recurrence | PGx – informing therapeutic choice | BCBSA TEC |
| Cancer—Colorectal | |||
| first-degree family history of colorectal cancer at a younger age or multiple affected first-degree relatives | colorectal cancer screening | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) | colon cancer | prognostic | NCCN Task Force NCCN Guideline |
| BRAF V600E/cetuximab, panitumumab | metastatic colorectal cancer | PGx | EGAPP NCCN Task Force |
| UGT1A1/irinotecan | Metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information EGAPP |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | patients meeting revised Bethesda guidelines or Amsterdam criteria | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | endometrial cancer in women under 50 years of age | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| consideration of testing for Lynch syndrome | people with 5% or higher risk of Lynch syndrome based on any prediction model | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | colorectal cancer diagnosed under 70 years of age, and those 70 and older who meet Bethesda guidelines | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | colorectal cancer in patients younger than 50 years | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | synchronous or metachronous colorectal or other Lynch syndrome-related tumors, at any age | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | MSI-H histology in colorectal cancer patients younger than 60 years | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | colorectal cancer in patient with relative (one or more first-degree) with Lynch syndrome related cancer that was diagnosed under age 50 years | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| testing for Lynch syndrome | colorectal cancer in patient with relatives (two or more first- or second-degree) with Lynch syndrome related cancer at any age | diagnostic, screening | NCCN |
| Cancer—Leukemia | |||
| FLT3-ITD | acute myeloid leukemia | predictive; prognostic | NCCN Task Force |
| CEBPA mutation | acute myeloid leukemia | predictive; prognostic | NCCN Task Force |
| NPM1 mutation | acute myeloid leukemia | predictive; prognostic | NCCN Task Force |
| KIT mutation | acute myeloid leukemia | predictive; prognostic | NCCN Task Force |
| Philadelphia chromosome/busulfan | chronic myelogenous leukemia | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| UGT1A1*28homozygotes/nilotinib | Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| FIP1L1-PDGFRα kinase/imatinib | hypereosinophilic syndrome and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| TPMT/thiopurines (mercaptopurine) | acute lymphatic leukemia | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| TPMT/thiopurines (thioguanine) | acute, non-lymphocytic leukemias | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Cancer—Lung | |||
| KRAS mutations [except c38G>A]/anti-EGFR therapy | non–small cell lung cancer | predictive; prognostic | NCCN Task Force |
| Cancer—Melanoma | |||
| G6PD/dabrafenib | unresectable or metastatic melanoma | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| family history of skin cancer | skin cancer screening in adults | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| Cancer—Other | |||
| DPD testing/5-FU (capecitabine) | Dukes’ C colon cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic breast cancer | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| family history of bladder cancer | bladder cancer screening | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| c-Kit D816V/imatinib | aggressive systemic mastocytosis | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| TPMT/cisplatin | metastatic testicular tumors, metastatic ovarian tumors, advanced bladder cancer | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Cardiovascular | |||
| family history relevant to dyslipidemia (otherwise undefined) | lipid screening in infants, children, adolescents, or young adults (up to age 20) | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| first-degree family history of abdominal aortic aneurysm requiring surgical repair | abdominal aortic aneurysm screening | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| SLCO1B1/simvastatin | dyslipidemia | PGx-dose | CPIC |
| CYP2C9, VKORC1/warfarin | venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, thromboembolic complications associated with atrial fibrillation and/or cardiac valve replacement, myocardial infarction | PGx-dose | CMS CED ACMG CPIC |
| CYP2D6/metoprolol | hypertension, angina pectoris, heart failure | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/carvedilol | chronic heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction following myocardial infarction, hypertension | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/carvedilol | chronic heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction following myocardial infarction, hypertension | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/propafenone | atrial fibrillation | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19/clopidogrel | non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral arterial disease |
PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information CPIC AHRQ |
| CYP2C19/prasugrel | acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19/tricagrelor | acute coronary syndrome | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| LDLR/pravastatin | hypercholesterolemia | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| F5, SERPINC1/eltrombopag | thrombocytopenia | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Endocrine disorders | |||
| G6PD/chlorpropamide | glycemic control, type 2 diabetes in adults | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/glimepiride | glycemic control, type 2 diabetes in adults | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/glipizide | glycemic control, type 2 diabetes in adults | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/glyburide | glycemic control, type 2 diabetes in adults | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Gastroenterology | |||
| CYP2C19/pantoprazole | gastroesophageal reflux disease, pathological hypersecretory conditions | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19/omeprazole | duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux disease | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19/esomeprazole | gastroesophageal reflux disease, NSAID-associated gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer recurrence, pathological hypersecretory conditions |
PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19/rabeprazole | gastroesophageal reflux disease, duodenal ulcers, pathological hypersecretory conditions | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19, CYP1A2/dexlansoprazole | erosive esophagitis, heartburn | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Infectious Disease | |||
| G6PD/chloroquine phosphate | malaria, extraintestinal amebiasis | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/dapsone (tablet) | leprosy | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information DailyMed |
| G6PD/mafenide acetate (for 5% topical solution) | bacterial infections | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/nitrofurantoin | antibacterial, specific urinary tract infections | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/primaquine | vivax malaria, radical cure (prevention of relapse) | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/quinine sulfate | uncomplicatedPlasmodium falciparum malaria | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/sulfamethoxazole & trimethoprim | bacterial infections | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| IL28B/boceprevir | chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| IL28B/telaprevir | chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| IL28B/peginterferon alfa-2b | chronic hepatitis C | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19/voriconazole | invasive aspergillosis, candidemia and disseminated candidiasis, esophageal candidiasis,Scedosporium apiospermum andFusarium spp. infection | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Neurology | |||
| CYP2C19/clobazam | seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HLA-B*1502/phenytoin | generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus and for seizures that occur during neurosurgery; testing pertains to risk for certain serious dermatologic reactions, which may be higher in patients of Chinese or Asian ancestry | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HLAB*1502/ carbamazepine | epilepsy, other seizure disorders, trigeminal neuralgia, bipolar disorder | PGx-dose | CPIC |
| CYP2D6, CYP2C19/diazepam | epilepsy | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/dextromethorphan and quinidine | pseudobulbar affect | PGx, PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Psychiatry | |||
| parental history of depression | major depressive disorder screening in adolescents | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history of depression | depression screening in adults | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| CYP2D6/amitriptyline | depression | PGx-dose | CPIC |
| CYP2D6/desipramine | depression | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/fluoxetine | major depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, bulimia nervosa, panic disorder | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/imipramine | depression | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/nortriptyline | depression | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/trimipramine | depression | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/venlafaxine | major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder | PGx, PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19, CYP2D6/citalopram | depression | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/aripiprazole | schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, major depressive disorder, autistic disorder | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/clozapine | schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/iloperidone | schizophrenia | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/risperidone | schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, autistic disorder | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/atomoxetine | attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/clomipramine | obsessive-compulsive disorder | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6, CYP2C19/fluvoxamine | obsessive compulsive disorder | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6, CYP2C19/doxepin | insomnia | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/modafinil | narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea, and shift work disorder | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Rheumatology | |||
| CYP2C19/carisoprodol | musculoskeletal conditions | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C9/celecoxib | osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, acute pain, primary dysmenorrhea | PGx-dose | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C9/flurbiprofen | rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| TPMT/thiopurines (azathioprine) | renal homotransplantation, rheumatoid arthritis | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| Other | |||
| family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip | developmental dysplasia of the hip screening in infants | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history of diabetes | gestational diabetes screening | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history of neonatal jaundice | Hyberbilirubinemia screening in infants; prevention of chronic bilirubin encephalopathy | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history of age-related macular degeneration | visual acuity screening in older adults | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history of chronic kidney disease | chronic kidney disease screening | risk prediction | USPSTF |
| family history for common diseases | common diseases | risk prediction | NIH State of the Science |
| CYP2D6/tolterodine | overactive bladder | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| HPRT1/mycophenolic acid | organ rejection | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2C19/drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol | pregnancy prevention, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, moderate acne | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| UGT1A1/indacaterol | chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, including chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/codeine | pain | PGx-dose | CPIC FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/tramadol and acetaminophen | acute pain | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| CYP2D6/cevimeline | dry mouth in patients with Sjögren’s Syndrome | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| DPD/fluorouracil cream | multiple actinic or solar keratoses |
PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/dapsone (gel) | acne vulgaris | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/dapsone (tablet) | dermatitis herpetiformis | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information DailyMed |
| G6PD/(polyethylene glycol 3350, sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium ascorbate, & ascorbice acid for oral solution) | laxative, preparation for colonoscopy in adults | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/sodium nitrite | life-threatening, acute cyanide poisoning | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| G6PD/succimer | lead poisoning, pediatric | PGx | FDA-PGx Drug Information |
| next generation sequencing/whole genome sequence | various rare familial diseases | diagnostic | BCBS TEC |
| various molecular, cytogenetic biochemical and other tests** | single gene disorders and chromosomal abnormalities where diagnosis and management may require use of genetic tests even without formal evidence synthesis and reviews by evidence panels | diagnosis, management, carrier testing | NIH GTR |
*Pharmacogenomic applications have been classified in the Use column as either PGx (which may relate to drug choice, prevention of adverse events, or other uses of the information gained through testing), or PGx-dose (when specific dosing-related guidance is provided, or mention of a potential effect on dose is noted in the evidence sources cited). Additional Use categories include: screening, cascade testing, risk prediction, diagnostic, and prognostic.
**This entry includes many genetic disorders for which there are no evidence-based recommendations, clinical guidelines or systematic reviews. However, a systematic search for evidence-based recommendations and reviews has not been conducted to date by our office. We expect further refinements in this classification in the near future.
Source Abbreviations: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC), US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Tier 3/Red category: represents genomic and family health history applications either have synthesized evidence culminating in recommendations against use (or discouraging use), OR no relevant synthesized evidence was identified. Such applications are not ready for routine practice, but may be considered in clinical and population research.
| Gene, Gene/Drug, Test, or Family History | Disorder/Indication | Use* | Synthesized Evidence Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| HFE | hereditary hemochromatosis | population screening | USPSTF |
| routine BRCA genetic counseling, routine BRCA testing | Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, in women whose family history is not associated with an increased risk of BRCA mutations | population screening | USPSTF |
| panels for various genetic risk factors | common diseases | risk assessment, disease prevention | Multiple sources, for example:EGAPP |
| next generation sequencing/whole genome sequence | various common diseases | risk prediction | Rapidly evolving landscape; gaps in knowledge exist for analytic validity, clinical validity and clinical utility |
| SNP panels | type 2 diabetes | risk prediction | EGAPP |
| TCF7L2 genotyping | type 2 diabetes | risk prediction | EGAPP |
| NRAS or PIK3CA mutation analysis and/or testing for loss of PTEN or AKT protein expression/anti-EGFR therapy | metastatic colorectal cancer | PGx | EGAPP Systematic review |
| CYP450 testing/SSRIs | non-psychotic depression | PGx, PGx-dose | EGAPP |
| tumor gene expression analysis (Prolaris®, Oncotype Dx® Prostate | prostate cancer | prognostic, management | BCBS TEC |
| emerging genomic tests in the CDC’sGAPP Finder |
various disorders | various uses | Almost all of these applications (except when listed above) have insufficient information on analytic or clinical validity, or clinical utility |
*Pharmacogenomic applications have been classified in the Use column as either PGx (which may relate to drug choice, prevention of adverse events, or other uses of the information gained through testing), or PGx-dose (when specific dosing-related guidance is provided, or mention of a potential effect on dose is noted in the evidence sources cited). Additional Use categories include: screening, cascade testing, risk prediction, diagnostic, and prognostic.
Source Abbreviations: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC), US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Other Abbreviations: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), pharmacogenomics (PGx), single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)
Prevent vascular disease, manage inflammation, get GYV health caps to boost ATP cells performance and speedy repair of your body, email connie to get the caps and join in spreading the benefits with extra income for you at motherhealth@gmail.com and text 408-854-1883
Physician assistants, growing service professionals for patient safety
-
A physician assistant (or PA) is a nationally certified and state-licensedmedical professional. PAs practice medicine on healthcare teams withphysicians and other providers. They practice and prescribemedication in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and all U.S. territories, with the exception of Puerto Rico.
- Dear PA,
- Your service is very important to promote patient safety
- Please contact me at 408-854-1883 motherhealth@gmail.com for toxicology and pharmacogenetic tests (now FDA approved and insurance covered) to promote patient safety and prevent adverse drug reactions.
Regards,
Toxicology test for pregnant women
Toxicology test for pregnant women
A toxicology screen is a test used to determine if an individual has been exposed to certain legal or illegal drugs. Toxicology screens are usually ordered to see if a patient has taken drugs that could endanger his or her health. If a patient is suspected of taking illegal drugs, a screen for specific drugs that are commonly abused may be ordered.
Toxicology screens are often ordered by hospital emergency department personnel when a patient appears to be impaired or is unconscious. Testing is also done in patients who have a change in mental status, in cases of seizures, and onset of dementia. Toxicology testing can also be useful in cases of suspected sexual assault.
In some cases, a patient may have been exposed to a prescription drug accidentally or overdose may be suspected. Some employers require random drug screening. Employees who test positive for illegal drug abuse may be suspended or fired.
The test can be performed fairly quickly. Results can help doctors treat the patient effectively and safely.
Types of Toxicology Screens
There are several types of toxicology screens. Most screening methods use a sample of urine to test for the presence of illegal narcotics or prescription drugs. Some, like the blood alcohol test, can determine the precise concentration of a particular drug. Others, like the urine screen, can indicate if a person has been exposed to drugs or poisons. Drug screens can also be performed on saliva.
One common type of toxicology test looks for evidence of alcohol abuse by a mother during pregnancy. Her newborn’s first stool is examined to predict a condition called fetal alcohol syndrome.
Most screens provide limited information about how much or how often a patient has taken a drug. Once the presence of a drug has been identified by screening, the doctor may order a more specific test, which will show exactly how much of the drug is present in the patient’s system.
The contents of the stomach may also be screened when doctors suspect a patient may have taken a drug orally.
How Samples for Toxicology Screens Are Obtained
Some toxicology screens are obtained by doing blood tests, which involve drawing one or more small tubes of blood. A medical professional inserts a needle into a vein and removes enough blood to perform the necessary tests.
If a urine sample is required, the patient may be asked to urinate into a small sample cup in the presence of law enforcement or medical personnel. This prevents the patient from tampering with the sample.
Types of Drugs Screened
Many types of drugs can be identified by toxicology screens. Depending on the drug, it may show up in the blood or urine hours or weeks after exposure to the drug. For example, alcohol is eliminated from the body relatively rapidly. It’s necessary to draw blood within about three hours of an automobile accident to accurately reflect a patient’s blood alcohol status at the time of the incident.
Other drugs, such as THC, a component of marijuana, may show up in urine for months after exposure. How long THC remains detectable depends on whether the patient is a heavy user.
Common classes of drugs that may be detected by toxicology screens include:
- alcohol (including ethanol and methanol)
- amphetamines (such as Adderall)
- barbiturates
- benzodiazepines
- methadone
- cocaine
- opiates (including codeine, oxycodone, heroin)
- phencyclidine (PCP)
- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
———–
Join 25,000 people in helping redefine health with health concierge and precision medicine.
https://clubalthea.com/2016/10/14/your-complete-dna-sequence-will-help-shape-the-future-of-medicine/
Chemicals taking a toll on reproductive health
Chemicals from a variety of sources are having an increasingly negative effect on human health—especially in children—so ob-gyns need to step up efforts to reverse this trend through advocacy and education, said Linda C. Giudice, MD, PhD, during the Donald F. Richardson Memorial Lecture on Monday, May 6, at the Annual Clinical Meeting.
Dr. Giudice presented “Environmental Chemical Effects on Reproductive Health Outcomes: Strength of the Evidence and What We Can Do for Our Patients, Learners, and Communities.” She is the Robert B. Jaffe, MD, Endowed Professor in the Reproductive Sciences at the University of California, San Francisco.
“Our scientists are taking a good look at the data and are finding trends that are disconcerting. We now have an opportunity to do something,” she said, pointing out that since lead was phased out of gasoline in 1973, blood lead levels have plummeted. “We can transform exposures.”
In the past 20 years, impaired fecundity in the US has increased from 8% to 12%, and 90% of that change has come in the 15–24 age group. In males, sperm counts and testosterone levels have declined about 1% per year in recent decades, Dr. Giudice said. At the same time, hypospadias and testicular germ cell tumors have increased.
“Malformations of the male reproductive system are among the most common birth defects today,” she said.
In adults, unhealthy trends have also developed. Prostate and breast cancers are increasing, and aggressive breast cancer has increased 36%.
Today, 80,000 chemical substances are registered for use in US commerce, and 700 new industrial chemicals are introduced into commerce each year. However, these chemicals are not monitored closely. “It is only when something happens and there are questions that this product or chemical is looked into in more depth,” Dr. Giudice said.
Evidence for adverse reproductive outcomes from exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals is strong, she said. “What can we as health professionals do? I think we can strengthen professional education in reproductive and environmental health at the undergraduate and medical education levels and at the graduate medical education level,” Dr. Giudice said. “I think we should share what we know with our patients. We should together advocate for chemical policy reform.”
Call to Action
Those who attend the Edith Louise Potter Memorial Lecture will be left with a challenge. Presenters Mary E. D’Alton, MD, New York, NY, and Sarah J. Kilpatrick, MD, PhD, Los Angeles, are hoping attendees are moved to action after hearing the lecture, “Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in the US: Time to Wake Up and Take the Lead,” from 11:15 am to 12:15 pm Tuesday in Skyline Ballroom (ABC).
“What I’m going to present is a plan that we believe every birthing center, hospital, and facility that delivers babies in the US should have within three years,” Dr. D’Alton said. “It’s going to focus on efforts that we believe will have a significant impact on reducing maternal mortality and morbidity.”
Dr. D’Alton said data suggest that maternal mortality has been increasing in the US during the last decade and serious maternal morbidity has increased even more so.
“We believe this is for several reasons, but some of it is related to the increased age of mothers as they become pregnant, so they have higher incidence of comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension, and also the national epidemic of obesity,” she said.
As a result of these increases, ACOG is joining several other societies to form the National Partnership for Maternal Safety.
“We felt because of there being no minimal progress in this area that all societies that deliver care to women needed to come together to make a plan,” Dr. D’Alton said. “The energy behind this is palpable right now. … The challenge before us is implementation.”
Dr. D’Alton knows not all maternal mortalities and morbidities are preventable, but the partnership’s goal is to reduce those that are preventable by 50% in five years.
Future of Patient Safety
Today, Joanna M. Cain, MD, will take her ACM attendees on a journey six years into the future for a unique, forward-thinking look at patient safety.
Dr. Cain’s one-hour presentation is this year’s Morton and Diane Stenchever Lecture. “Keeping Our Patients Safe: Key Actions for Ob-Gyn for All Stages and Sites of Patient Care,” begins at 4 pm in Ballroom ABC. It will examine the direction patient safety is going—and what it could look like in the year 2020.
Dr. Cain’s presentation will cover actions that ob-gyns need to take to change how they educate students and residents and how they manage their own practice, taking into consideration the effects of all the new technology. How does that influence patient safety and how ob-gyns deliver care in the future?
Dr. Cain said present day is a tumultuous time in medicine because of technological innovations such as electronic medical records, and even Google Glass, the computerized eyewear. These technologies may affect students’ education and help train and evaluate ob-gyn surgical competence.
“How we teach is changing,” Dr. Cain said. “The cost of education is probably too high, so how we structure our future will make a difference in making sure we have a pipeline for the future.”
Dr. Cain will emphasize education that equips residents to be leaders in safety education and will discuss restructuring ambulatory practices. She’ll also look at what role ACOG’s Safety Certification in Outpatient Practice Excellence for Women’s Health Program (SCOPE) might play down the road.
The look ahead offers the chance for several intriguing “what-if” questions.
“What if, instead of seeing students as sort of a burden to practice, what if they came with skills that we could leverage to make practices safer?” Cain said. “What if they knew those skills from early on? What if medical schools worked together in the first years and shared a similar national curriculum with flipped classrooms?
“And what would it look like if there were students in almost every practice in the country and that’s how we educated students—and they were the front line of making sure we continue to improve safety and quality?”
Join 25,000 people in helping redefine health with health concierge and precision medicine.
https://clubalthea.com/2016/10/14/your-complete-dna-sequence-will-help-shape-the-future-of-medicine/
Psychiatric medications and pharmacogenetic test
Oxycodone narcotics reduced risk with use of pharmacogenetic test
Personalized oxycodone dosing: using pharmacogenetic testing and clinical pharmacokinetics to reduce toxicity risk and increase effectiveness.
Integrating pharmacogenetics goal
To develop a framework for integrating pharmacogenetics with clinical pharmacokinetics for personalized oxycodone dosing based on a patient’s CYP2D6 phenotype.
Design includes genotyped as CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizer, extensive metabolizer, or poor metabolizer phenotypes
Randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Subjects were genotyped as CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizer, extensive metabolizer, or poor metabolizer phenotypes. Five subjects from each phenotype were randomly selected for inclusion in our study.
Subjects
The subjects were male, age 26 years, height 181.2 cm, and weight 76.3 kg. They were healthy without comorbidities, and their medical examinations were normal.
Methods
The trajectories of phenotype-specific plasma oxycodone concentration-time profiles were analyzed using weighted nonlinear least-squares regression with WinSAAM software. A global two-stage population-based model data analysis procedure was used to analyze the studies. Clinical pharmacokinetics were calculated using the R package cpk, eliminating the need to perform hand-calculations.
Reduce risk and increase effectiveness for oxycodone dosing
Our study shows how clinicians can reduce risk and increase effectiveness for oxycodone dosing by (1) determining the patient’s likely metabolic response through testing a patient’s CYP2D6 phenotype, and (2) calculating clinical pharmacokinetics specific to the patient’s CYP2D6 phenotype to design a personalized oxycodone dosing regimen.
Conclusion: Reduce risk with integration of pharmacogenetics
Personalized oxycodone dosing is a new tool for a clinician treating chronic pain patients requiring oxycodone. By expressing a patient’s CYP2D6 phenotype pharmacokinetically, a clinician (at least theoretically) can improve the safety and efficacy of oxycodone and decrease the risk for iatrogenically induced overdose or death. Pharmacokinomics provides a general framework for the integration of pharmacogenetics with clinical pharmacokinetics into clinical practice for gene-based prescribing.
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Contact Connie Dello Buono,certified rep if you are a doctor or medical sales rep who wants patient safety and added income stream to prevent Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs). motherhealth@gmail.com 408-854-1883
200 top prescribed meds and pharmacogenetic tests to prevent reactions
Avail of pharmacogenetic and toxicology tests to reduce adverse drug reactions and to promote patient safety for the following 200 top prescribed meds. Contact Connie Dello Buono if you are a doctor or med rep at motherhealth@gmail.com 408-854-1883.
Top 200 Drugs
- Misoprostol
325 - Oxycodone
3461 - Hydrocodone
1936 - Xanax Alprazolam
1674 - Percocet Acetaminophen + Oxycodone
1187 - Tramadol
818 - Methamphetamine
210 - Suboxone Buprenorphine
1429 - Viagra Sildenafil
257 - Methadone
1568 - Acetaminophen
2081 - Morphine
1384 - OxyContin Oxycodone
1003 - Cytotec Misoprostol
269 - Alprazolam
665 - Adderall Amphetamine + Dextroamphetamine
641 - Subutex Buprenorphine
376 - Gabapentin
578 - Clonazepam
680 - Dilaudid Hydromorphone
512 - Norco Acetaminophen + Hydrocodone
541 - Priligy Dapoxetine
5 - Cyclobenzaprine
322 - Vicodin Acetaminophen + Hydrocodone
750 - Amphetamine
350 - Amoxicillin
702 - Roxicodone Oxycodone
254 - Opana Oxymorphone Hydrochloride
450 - Cocaine
205 - Diazepam
369 - Valium Diazepam
504 - MiraLax Polyethylene Glycol
26 - Neurontin Gabapentin
166 - Naproxen
549 - Diclofenac
392 - Klonopin Clonazepam
383 - Sulfamethoxazole
422 - Phentermine
375 - Methocarbamol
215 - Ibuprofen
609 - Fentanyl
445 - Metoprolol
620 - Hydroxyzine
260 - Amitriptyline
308 - Lorazepam
349 - Citalopram
349 - Progesterone
239 - Vyvanse Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
182 - Metronidazole
199 - Escitalopram
179 - Meloxicam
205 - Lupron Leuprolide
4 - Aspirin
705 - Prednisone
379 - Lyrica Pregabalin
415 - Dinintel Clobenzorex
72 - Etoshine Etoricoxib
37 - Metformin
625 - Promethazine
197 - Trazodone
266 - Cephalexin
201 - Lortab Acetaminophen + Hydrocodone
585 - Amlodipine
409 - Drixoral Cold & Allergy Dexbrompheniramine + Pseudoephedrine
39 - Doxycycline
284 - Tizanidine
133 - Hydromorphone
188 - Ciprofloxacin
208 - Lisinopril
483 - Acetaminophen + Hydrocodone
18 - Buprenorphine
78 - Soma Carisoprodol
288 - Pregabalin
174 - Butalbital
60 - Penicillin
294 - Diphenhydramine
152 - Quetiapine
88 - Pantoprazole
189 - Cyproheptadine
81 - Paracetamol Acetaminophen
288 - Baclofen
136 - Oxytocin
11 - Sertraline
213 - Buspirone
113 - Codeine
259 - Falmina Ethinyl Estradiol + Levonorgestrel
1 - Zolpidem
270 - Folic Acid
286 - Clonidine
178 - Augmentin Amoxicillin + Clavulanic Acid
185 - Nidol Nimesulide
1 - Vitamin E
172 - Azithromycin
133 - Oxymorphone
74 - ECASA Aspirin

- Atorvastatin
214 - Omeprazole
238 - Tylenol Acetaminophen
545 - Dexamethasone
90 - Cheratussin AC Codeine + Guaifenesin
19 - Doxytetracycline Doxycycline
10 - Seroquel Quetiapine
199 - Clindamycin
127 - Montelukast
99 - Carisoprodol
110 - Mirtazapine
169 - Guaiatussin AC Codeine + Guaifenesin
1 - Butesin Picrate Butamben Picrate
11 - Ativan Lorazepam
205 - Aceclofenac
108 - Zubsolv Buprenorphine + Naloxone
27 - Propranolol
180 - Bupropion
196 - Levothyroxine
363 - Methylphenidate
126 - Dextroamphetamine
55 - Lo Loestrin Fe Norethindrone Acetate + Ethinyl Estradiol and Ethinyl Estradiol + Ferrous Fumarate
304 - Wellbutrin Bupropion
119 - Cetirizine
119 - Sildenafil
76 - Endocet Acetaminophen + Oxycodone
113 - Chlordiazepoxide
63 - Sibutramine
143 - Opcon-A Naphazoline + Pheniramine

- Rabeprazole
107 - Losartan
262 - Telmisartan
158 - Ranitidine
204 - Flexeril Cyclobenzaprine
99 - Arthrexin Indomethacin
10 - Dicyclomine
103 - Loperamide
63 - Concerta Methylphenidate
99 - Chlorpheniramine
113 - Ambien Zolpidem
221 - Acetylcysteine
38 - Chlorzoxazone
57 - Fluoxetine
172 - Brintellix Vortioxetine
14 - MS Contin Morphine
133 - Histamine Dihydrochloride
1 - Bactrim Sulfamethoxazole + Trimethoprim, SMX-TMP
204 - Pseudoephedrine
107 - Oxymetazoline
2 - Spasmoctyl Otilonium Bromide
7 - Nitrofurantoin
204 - Acid Mantle Creme Aluminum Acetate, Burow’s Solution
1 - Clopidogrel
98 - Niacin Niacinamide
37 - Temazepam
117 - Nimesil Nimesulide
3 - Phenylephrine
75 - Ondansetron
75 - Cefixime
87 - Levetiracetam
60 - BuSpar Buspirone
43 - Adderall XR Amphetamine + Dextroamphetamine
27 - Hydroxychloroquine
43 - Acetaminophen + Oxycodone
12 - Purbac Sulfamethoxazole + Trimethoprim, SMX-TMP
79 - Guaifenesin
196 - Cymbalta Duloxetine
212 - Fioricet Acetaminophen + Butalbital + Caffeine
94 - Topiramate
55 - Furosemide
149 - Lexapro Escitalopram
214 - Darvocet Acetaminophen + Propoxyphene
176 - Trimethoprim
141 - Phendimetrazine
39 - Lamotrigine
85 - Hypotears Artificial Tears
4 - Ephedrine
88 - Levofloxacin
67 - Hyoscyamine
73 - Sudafed Pseudoephedrine
65 - Buro-Sol Aluminum Acetate, Burow’s Solution
2 - Ampicillin
76 - Colistimethate Colistimethate Sodium

- Xanax XR Alprazolam XR
2 - Codeine + Promethazine

- Urimax Hyoscyamine + Methenamine + Methylene Blue + Phenyl Salicylate + Sodium Biphosphate
41 - Testosterone
78 - Domperidone
59 - Atenolol
186 - Ofloxacin
63 - Robaxin Methocarbamol
44 - Dextromethorphan
64 - Biphetamine Amphetamine + Dextroamphetamine
2 - Borofax Boric Acid
13 - Sprintec Ethinyl Estradiol + Norgestimate
214 - Ritalin Methylphenidate
152 - Aspergum Aspirin
11 - Methylprednisolone
84 - Melatonin
62 - Propoxyphene
103 - Cialis Tadalafil
87 - Biotin
66 - Asthalin Salbutamol
23 - Benadryl Diphenhydramine
108 - Quinine
70
Need 10,000 doctors to prevent adverse drug reactions using pharmacogenetic tests
Need 10,000 doctors to prevent adverse drug reactions using pharmacogenetic tests
Join 25,000 people in helping redefine health with health concierge and precision medicine.
https://clubalthea.com/2016/10/14/your-complete-dna-sequence-will-help-shape-the-future-of-medicine/
Contact Connie Dello Buono, motherhealth@gmail.com to set up the pharmacogenetic test and tox test in your practice for patient safety for those who are taking so many meds.

Why Your Workplace Might Be Killing You by Shana Lynch
Stanford scholars identify 10 work stressors that are destroying your health.

We may be long past the days of Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle, the seminal book that depicted the harsh working conditions in America’s meatpacking industry in the early 20th century, but the workplace is still hazardous to our health.
Workplace stress — such as long hours, job insecurity and lack of work-life balance — contributes to at least 120,000 deaths each year and accounts for up to $190 billion in health care costs, according to new research by two Stanford professors and a former Stanford doctoral student now at Harvard Business School.
“If employers are serious about managing the health of their workforce and controlling their health care costs, they ought to be worried about the environments their workers are in,” says Jeffrey Pfeffer, a Stanford professor of organizational behavior. Pfeffer, with colleagues Stefanos A. Zenios of Stanford GSB and Joel Goh of Harvard Business School, conducted a meta-analysis of 228 studies, examining how 10 common workplace stressors affect a person’s health.

They found that overall, these stressors increase the nation’s health care costs by 5% to 8%. Job insecurity increased the odds of reporting poor health by 50%, while long work hours increased mortality by almost 20%. Additionally, highly demanding jobs raised the odds of a physician-diagnosed illness by 35%.
“The deaths are comparable to the fourth- and fifth-largest causes of death in the country — heart disease and accidents,” says Zenios, a professor of operations, information, and technology. “It’s more than deaths from diabetes, Alzheimer’s, or influenza.”
Physical and Psychological Impact
The stressor with the biggest impact overall is lack of health insurance. It ranks high in both increasing mortality and health care costs. Another big driver of early death is economic insecurity, captured in part by unemployment, layoffs, and low job control.
The ramifications for the uninsured should come as no surprise, Pfeffer says, but what did surprise the team was the high impact of psychological stressors. Work-family conflict and work injustice had just as much impact on health as long work hours or shift work.
For example, employees who reported that their work demands prevented them from meeting their family obligations or vice versa were 90% more likely to self-report poor physical health, the researchers note. And employees who perceive their workplaces as being unfair are about 50% more likely to develop a physician-diagnosed condition.
How to Fix Wellness Programs
Pfeffer first became interested in this subject while working on the Stanford Committee for Faculty and Staff Human Resources. Many companies and organizations such as Stanford, he says, institute wellness programs that focus on encouraging employees to eat better or exercise more. Meanwhile, these companies overlook the atmosphere of the workplace setting itself.
Smoking cessation programs or incentives to lose weight focus on individual behavior and ignore management practices that create stress and set the context for employee choices. “Lots of research shows that your tendency to overeat, overdrink, and take drugs are affected by your workplace,” Pfeffer says. “When people like their lives, and that includes work life, they will do a better job of taking care of themselves. When they don’t like their lives, they don’t.”
Focus Policy on Prevention
Good health matters to people and employers, but it also matters to government. The U.S. spends a higher proportion of its GDP on health care than most other industrialized countries, and significantly more per capita, the researchers note.
The researchers suggest regulations and policy changes that go beyond current overtime restrictions and wage laws, and focus on prevention. “Forty or 50 years ago, I could put toxins into the air or water, and someone else had to pay to clean it up,” Pfeffer says. “We decided that wasn’t very good because it costs more to remediate than prevent. It’s true in the case of human health as well,’’ he says. “It costs more to remediate the effects of toxic workplaces than it does to prevent their ill effects in the first place.”
One suggestion is tax incentives that could encourage employers to offer more work-family balance or reduce layoffs. Non-regulatory actions like guidelines or best practices might also prove fruitful.
The study has some limitations, the researchers acknowledge. They are unable to make strong causal inference linking these stressors to poor health because the studies they used are observational. “It is association — it doesn’t mean that there’s causation,” Zenios says. “There may be other factors going on.” Also, people handle stress differently, so it’s difficult to assess how attitudes toward stress affect the results. Finally, the researchers looked at only 10 stressors, examining simple ones that could be addressed by management changes.
Rethinking the Workplace
Improving the work environment is not a Herculean feat, and many companies are already thinking beyond programs such as smoking cessation to those that address these stressors, Pfeffer says. Companies need to get serious about creating a workplace where people feel valued, trusted, and respected, where they are engaged in their work, don’t worry about losing their jobs, and where they can get home in time for family dinner, he says.
“My meta point is that we have lost focus on human well-being. It’s all about costs now. Can we afford this, can we afford that? Does it lead to better or worse financial performance for the company?” Pfeffer says. “We’re talking about human beings and the quality of their lives. To me, that ought to get some attention.”

Jeffrey Pfeffer is the Thomas D. Dee II Professor of Organizational Behavior. Stefanos A. Zenios is the Charles A. Holloway Professor of Operations, Information, and Technology and Professor of Health Care Management.
I love thumbtack
I love thumbtack
http://www.thumbtack.com/reviews/services/oqv4OVwUJH9fjA/write
I am your life coach, providing you cues for happiness and success in all areas: health and finance. Connie Dello Buono , motherhealth@gmail.com 408-854-1883





