408-854-1883 starts at $30 per hr home care

Dr Nathan Newman using stem cell to rejuvenate skin cells, no more facial surgery.

Infectious organisms spread in labs causing death by Dr Mercola.

At some point between June 6 and June 13, an estimated 751-842 scientists and staff members at a US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) biolab were exposed to live anthrax.

The live pathogen had been sent from another, higher-security facility, which failed to follow biosafety protocols. According to one report:3

“The exposure incident is unprecedented in the history of American research on bioweapons and other deadly pathogens, prompting alarm among researchers who have already warned about the consequences of lax laboratory oversight globally.

Scientists in and out of the CDC say the process of handling such bacteria and viruses must be improved.”

While unprecedented in terms of the number of people exposed, this isn’t the first time this kind of potentially lethal blunder has occurred with live anthrax in the US. Also, it’s not unprecedented in global terms.

In the 1979 Sverdlovsk incident, 94 Russians were exposed to anthrax through an accidental release, and 64 of them died. Incidents such as these really raise questions about mankind’s ability to contain the lethal microorganisms being studied (and created) in labs around the world.

In this case, the anthrax sample was supposed to have been inactivated prior to transfer, but for a variety of reasons it wasn’t dead on arrival.

The director of the CDC’s Bioterror Rapid Response and Advanced Technology Laboratory, Michael Farrell, has since been reassigned,4 and two Congressional committees are monitoring the situation to determine whether public hearings are warranted.

Natural Pandemics versus Accidental Releases of Bioweapons

All affected personnel are being treated with potent antibiotics and some have also taken an anthrax vaccine to fend off the lethal infection. But as noted byScientific American,5 the issues here go beyond figuring out why safety procedures weren’t followed in this particular incident.

“[W]hich is the more likely threat to public safety—a series of accidental releases of deadly organisms from the high-level biodefense labs that have proliferated in the wake of the anthrax attacks of 2001 or a single, but much bigger, intentional release by an actual terrorist network?” Scientific American asks.

Indeed, while the fear of a mutated virus turning into a pandemic is flouted virtually every year to some degree, a far greater concern appears to be the potential for an engineered bioweapon somehow escaping the confines of our top level bioterror labs.6, 7

The latest failure to follow safety procedures again highlights the fact that seemingly unbelievable errors can and do occur, despite all promises to the contrary. Part of the problem appears to be that most of the safety protocols center around technology and equipment, while the human factor is overlooked.

Smallpox Found in Unapproved Lab​

More recently, an even more disconcerting event took place that really raises questions about what pathogens we have, and exactly where they’re being kept.

It’s nice to think that all the vials of deadly microorganisms are all accounted for and safely locked away in high security labs, but we keep learning that reality does not conform to such cozy notions.

On July 8, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that vials containing the smallpox virus had been discovered in a Maryland lab—a lab that was neither approved nor equipped to handle live pathogens. As reported by Gizmodo8

“Only two labs in the entire world are legally permitted to handle the stuff: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Atlanta headquarters and the VECTOR Institute in Russia. In other words, not the NIH’s Bethesda, Maryland campus.

While it’s currently unclear how long these deadly smallpox vials (which violate at 35-year-old international agreement) have been hiding out,according to CDC spokesman Tom Skinner, the boxes holding them may date back to the 1950s.”

Maximum Level Safety Appears Increasingly Difficult to Maintain

During an October 2007 congressional hearing, Keith Rhodes, the chief technologist at the Government Accountability Office (GAO) stated that we’re at greater risk of an infectious disease epidemic today than ever before, because of increases in the number of biolabs around the world, combined with a lack of oversight.

A 2008 Scientific American article9 also quotes Rutgers University microbiologist Richard Ebright as saying there’s been a “20- to 30-fold increase in the number of institutions and individuals with access to live, virulent bioweapons agents” after the 2001 incident where letters containing anthrax killed five Americans.

At that point, in 2008, an estimated 15,000 people at 400 institutions had access to live, lethal agents! In response to the latest anthrax exposure, Ebright stated10that: “The lapse is not an isolated incident, but instead is part of a continuing pattern of biosafety and biosecurity problems at the CDC.” As noted in the featured article,11 intentional and/or unintentional releases of deadly agents from high security laboratories have proven far more deadly, not to mention far morefrequent, than any organized terrorist attack using bioweapons…

History Shows Biolabs Pose Great Risks to Public Safety

The following is a listing of a few of these deadly biolab mistakes that have occurred over the years. Even more accidental releases are listed on Kenneth Ring’s website Germs Gone Wild.12 A 2008 article in The Observer13 also raises questions about the logic of the locations of some of these labs. For example, a high containment biolab in Galveston, Texas is located in a hurricane flood zone, making the risk of accidental release a more or less annual concern!

In 1971, a former Soviet biological weapons testing facility released a deadly strain of hemorrhagic smallpox—allegedly during an open-air test. Hundreds were quarantined, 50,000 people were vaccinated, and three people died.14

In 1978, a University of Birmingham laboratory inadvertently released the smallpox virus, which ended up killing a British medical photographer.15

In 1979 there was an “accidental atmospheric release” of anthrax in Sverdlovsk, Russia,16 which killed 64 of the 94 infected individuals.17

During the mid-1980s, Bayer sold millions of dollars worth of an injectable blood-clotting medicine to Asian, Latin American, and some European countries, knowing it was tainted with the AIDS virus. This is yet another example of how deadly pathogens can make their way out of the lab, and into the human population. .

In 2001, US Army biodefense scientist Bruce Ivins allegedly mailed letters containing a live research strain of anthrax from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. Shortly thereafter, he committed suicide. Five people died from the exposure. It was the Army’s most virulent (Ames) strain.

In 2004, a lab in Maryland accidentally sent live anthrax to a California children’s hospital. The CDC investigated the incident and created recommendations designed to make sure something like this would never happen again, yet the near-identical chain of mistakes and protocol failures just occurred at their own facility.18

In 2009, Baxter accidentally sent vaccines contaminated with live and deadly avian (bird) flu to a research facility in Europe. The mistake originated in a Baxter plant operating under Bio Safety Level 3 (BSL3) status — meaning that high-level precautions are supposed to be in place to make sure an accident like this never happens. The company blamed the incident on human error, again demonstrating that, apparently, it takes just one absent-minded dingbat to circumvent the highest level biosafety system currently in existence.

In 2012, it was discovered that the bioterror germ lab at the CDC in Atlanta (the same building where the latest anthrax safety breach occurred) has had repeated problems with airflow systems designed to help prevent the release of infectious agents such as anthrax, dangerous strains of influenza, the SARS coronavirus, and monkeypox. Air from a research lab in one of the Biosafety Level 3 buildings was being vented into a so-called “clean” area, where visitors are not required to wear protective gear. While no one was infected, the problems were major violations of laboratory operating standards.19, 20

Also in 2012, a vaccine researcher at the Northern California Institute for Research died shortly after being infected with the Neisseria meningitides bacteria at work. He was working on a vaccine against the pathogen, and according to the site chief was following required precautions for working with the deadly pathogens.21

Multiple Protocol Breaches Found at US Federal Bioterror Labs

According to a recent report by Reuters,22 the latest anthrax release was the result of multiple protocol breaches. First of all, the anthrax researchers waited only half the time required to ensure the pathogen had been inactivated before sending it out. Protocols call for samples to be incubated for 48 hours to be sure anthrax spores are entirely inactivated, but the batch was checked after only 24 hours of incubation.

Moreover, the exact same mistake occurred in the 2004 anthrax release, when live pathogen was sent to a California children’s hospital. At the time, the CDC recommended that labs wait several days to confirm that the pathogen is in fact dead, before shipping it out to lower-security facilities. It also recommended that the receiving lab should treat samples as live until confirmed dead. When asked why the CDC didn’t follow its own recommendations, thereby allowing for a second, virtually identical anthrax release, CDC biosafety officer, Dr Paul Meechan, said it was “a great question,” to which he doesn’t have a good answer…

Another safety breach relates to the way the pathogen was inactivated. The researchers used a newer method involving chemicals rather than radiation. This method, it turns out, may not have been properly tested and validated as an effective method of inactivation.

Two investigations are currently underway to determine exactly what happened, and how to tighten safety protocols at labs working with highly infectious and lethal pathogens. The CDC is conducting its own internal investigation, and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) is also looking into the breach. A 2012 USDA audit23 had already raised red flags. Even earlier reports have been equally critical. As reported by Reuters:24

“The Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC’s parent agency, in reports released in 2008 and 2010, documented a long list of issues. CDC labs working with the most dangerous agents did not always ensure the physical security of the pathogens or restrict access to them, and did not always ensure that personnel received required training.”

Changes Are Sorely Needed

These biosafety problems, and their inherently devastating risks to public health, have been noted worldwide. At present, 24 European countries have embraced a new set of biorisk management standards, which are also backed by the World Health Organization (WHO). These biorisk management standards will likely be adopted by the International Organization for Standardization, which could lessen the risks associated with these research facilities. But can management standards ever completely eradicate the risks posed by research into biological weapons?

As I mentioned at the outset, each year we’re warned of potential new pandemics—mutated viruses and bacteria that might kill off large portions of the population. Vaccines are the standard answer, and many of the most deadly pathogens in biolabs around the world are kept for vaccine development.

The conundrum here is that vaccine development itself is a potential source of a deadly outbreak. The industry would like you to believe that drugs and vaccines are created under pristine conditions and that nothing can go wrong. But they certainly do go wrong from time to time, and sometimes companies don’t even bother to correct their mistakes, for fear it might eat up their profits! Crazy as it may sound, Bayer’s selling of AIDS tainted blood-clotting medicine is just one of several examples of potentially lethal contaminations.

In general, I believe we need to consider the financial motives behind the promotion of pandemics and the vaccines that go along with them. From a personal perspective, it’s vital for you to carefully research ALL sides of any vaccine issue and not merely trust federal public health authorities, most physicians, and the media, as they are largely influenced by massive conflicts of interest and collusion. Seek independent and objective views like those at NVIC25 before you make any important decisions about deciding to vaccinate.

That said, the latest anthrax exposure clearly suggests that blindly accepting safety assurances is a foolhardy proposition. “Trustand verify” would be a far better approach. In the case of bioterror lab safety, the question is who is actually doing the verifying?

One cup of coffee before exercise in the morning burns 15% more calories by Dr Mercola.

Retrain your eyes, free from strain, to see more clearly again by Dr Mercola.

Wouldn’t it be wonderful to be able to see clearly without glasses or contacts? According to Greg Marsh, a certified natural vision coach, clear vision is achievable by virtually everyone, even if you’re already wearing strong corrective lenses.

He created the CD program Reclaim Your Eyesight Naturally, which teaches you how to retrain your eyes to relax, thereby allowing you to see more clearly.

I first sought Greg out several years ago, at the suggestion of a man who, in his 70s, had excellent vision. After trying it out, I was hooked.

Greg got his first pair of glasses in third grade, and at every vision check, he needed stronger, thicker lenses. His life changed when, in his late 20s, he came across a book written by a teacher of Dr. Bates’ vision program.

“It just melted my heart, the stories about people improving their eyesight and getting their lives back,” he says. “I started trying it on my own near-sightedness. I had some initial success and then kind of hit a plateau.

That’s when things got really interesting for me. I eventually did a formal training as a natural vision teacher. I bought every program I could find. I also did a lot of cross-training in various ways to use the mind. I went into martial arts, meditation, and all kinds of things.

For many years, I just kept diving in every which way, and it just became irresistibly simple, interesting, and subtle.”

A Technique So Effective, It Was Banned…

The method Greg teaches was initially conceived by Dr. William H. Bates, over 100 years ago. A board-certified ophthalmologist at the top of his field, Dr. Bates taught his method to many, and it was so effective that it ended up being banned in New York after the optometrists lobbied the local politicians!

In essence, it became a threat to the business model of optometrists. The prohibition on the Bates Method is still on the books in New York to this day. Whether or not it’s actually prosecuted is another issue.

“In the 1950s and the early 1960s, that’s when all the state optometry boards were going after people,” Greg says. “One of the Bates practitioners they went after was Clara Hackett, who had worked personally with Aldous Huxley, who’s one of the more famous successors.

He wrote the book The Art of Seeing. He was basically told, ‘You’re blind. Get onboard with Braille.’ He got his vision back from working with the Bates Method.

Clara Hackett was on trial because she didn’t want to fold up and go home. All these people came in and testified. Aldous Huxley, the famous author of Brave New World, came in and testified.

He was very popular, so the jury was kind of in awe. Apparently, during the break of the jury, all the jurors were palming. Then they knew the outcome was going to be good.”

The Bates Method

So how does the Bates Method work? Greg explains:

“Basically, there are six muscles on the outside of your eye, and they’re moving it around… Ideally, these muscles are easily following visual interests… The problem is – it could be for emotional reasons, physical stress, or whatever – you start to strain. Once you start to strain, your vision starts to go.”

The action of straining essentially squeezes your eyeballs, contorting them. This makes your vision blurry, as it alters where the field of vision “lands” on your retina. Now you have three basic choices

1. Find out what’s stressing you, making you strain. Let it go, relax, and get your vision back. Dr. Bates developed ingenious tools for doing just that
2. Get laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), which permanently alters your focal length
3. Get corrective lenses. The problem with corrective lenses is that now you’re creating permanent strain

The Bates Method isn’t really an exercise; it’s more of a mental approach. It’s also worth noting that the Bates Method is clearly NOT a medical approach. You still need to see your regular eye doctor for checkups. Greg explains the theory upon which his program is based as follows:

“Dr. Bates’ keyword is ‘strain.’ If you strain your eyes, strain your thoughts, and strain your vision, these muscles are going to start getting tight. The strain is the essence of everything.

Imagine you’re on a tightrope, you’re walking, and you’re feeling your way forward. That’s how the eyes want to work. If you get tense on a tightrope, you’re dead, right? Instead of thinking of it as exercises, you have to go into it in a really subtle way; it’s more like a meditation.”

Basically, your vision is not compromised because of weak eye muscles. They’re strong enough. They’re just too tensed to work properly, so you have to relax them.

When people have a hard time seeing they typically will squint, which actually makes your vision worse. Squinting is one of the worst things you can do for your vision as it stresses your muscles. I find myself all day long paying attention to this as typical response is to contract your eye muscles and squint.

Another part of the process is “faith”—faith that your eyes “know what they’re doing” and can see well. The problem is that once you start wearing corrective lenses, you’re actually worsening your vision. This progressive worsening of your vision can lead to a defeatist mentality if you don’t realize that what you’re doing is creating the problem.

Be certain that you do the little experiment Greg discusses in the video by creating a pinhole with your hand and surprising yourself how clear your vision becomes without any corrective lenses. Just bend your finger to create a small pinhole between the skin folds. Now hold the pinhole in front of your eye, and notice how much more in focus everything is that you’re looking at. As they say, seeing is believing and this will go a long way to convince you that you can actually see well without corrective lenses.

By wearing glasses, you’re essentially retraining your eyes to strain in order to see all day long. Ideally, you’ll want to remove your glasses whenever you can safely do so. Also make sure you have appropriate lighting, especially when reading. “The amount of light is huge,” Greg notes. “While somebody is making the transition from needing glasses to not needing glasses, things like using more light really help, like if you’re reading a book.”

Common Vision Problems Caused by Excessive Eye Strain

The two most common eyesight conditions requiring glasses are: (1) myopia (near-sightedness, which usually appears in childhood or during teenage years) and (2) presbyopia (a type of farsightedness which leads to reading glasses at middle age). They both are very responsive to the Bates Method, and in fact the approach is nearly identical. If you have a mild prescription, you can simply go more and more frequently without glasses as you improve your eyesight. Of course, you should always wear glasses if they are required for driving, until you pass your vision test without them.

Especially with nearsightedness, stronger prescriptions tend to require more creativity and persistence, since the habits of staring and straining are more established. Also with high nearsightedness, you may need to progressively work your way down, which can be an expense for more pairs of glasses. But the visual clarity and relaxation you will feel all through your body and mind makes it deeply rewarding! The need for reading glasses is a common age-related problem, but according to Dr. Bates, loss of vision is not a “fact of life” at all. Even this he relates to eye strain.

“Most optometrists or ophthalmologists would say that the ciliary muscle around the lens is the cause—that it gets frozen. They’ll say, ‘Well, gee, your lens has become impossibly hard and now it doesn’t move anymore,’ Greg says. 

The lens of your eye, which is behind your cornea, right behind the iris, thickens and thins continuously all day long as you focus on various things. It also grows as you age. Eye doctors will say that your lens has become too large and rigid, and can’t flex anymore. But according to Greg, the problem with that model is that most people who sincerely apply the Bates Method do reduce or eliminate their need for reading glasses. Once again Dr. Bates’ solution is to relax the eyes so the muscles can function naturally.

The Power of Your Mind

Astigmatism, cross-eye, glaucoma, cataracts, and other vision conditions can also benefit from the Bates Method. With regards to cross-eye, Greg notes that this problem is not really caused by too-short a muscle pulling the eye. Rather it’s that the muscle is chronically too tight, and if you relax it, your eye will typically go back to its normal position.

“I love working with people who have been diagnosed with glaucoma or cataract and who are open to natural approaches,” he says. “One lady I worked with was about to get surgery for glaucoma. Her doctor told her she’d already lost 60 percent of her vision just in one eye. I had an amazing EFT session with her. I told her to palm 10 minutes at a time at least six times a day. Three or four days later, she let me know that her score dropped from 28 down to 12 on glaucoma in that eye. Her doctor said, ‘Oh, wow. The medicine finally started to work.'”

Dr. Bates used to experiment with visualizations for patients with cataracts—a condition where the lens of your eye gets cloudy. One of Dr. Bates’ patients who had cataracts was able to make her cataracts disappear through guided visualization alone. When she got stressed out again, the cataracts reappeared.

“I don’t want to put anybody in a box and say, ‘Oh, your thoughts are negative.’ But if you’re having negative thoughts, imagine you can feel how that manifests as, say, a cataract. Louise Hay, the guru of emotional reasons for disease, she would say the reason for cataract is the future looks dark. I can’t tell you how many people have resonated with that. They’ve had a family member who died, a big business bust, or they just realized, ‘Wow, I’m getting old. I haven’t done everything I wanted.’ That metaphor of ‘the future looks dark.’

Now just imagine the crystalline structure of the eyes and how ever that magically transmutes into the cataract and the opacity. Now imagine changing that vibration and then just asking: ‘How fast can I imagine and how fast can I allow for this change to take place?'”

Remember that the Bates Method is not a medical approach, and you must seek a licensed practitioner for any diagnosis, prescription, or treatment. The Bates Method is more like meditation or yoga. It can help you engage your mind and imagination, to relax your eyes, and bring about as much natural healing as possible.

Sample Bates Method Techniques

One of the most famous Bates Method techniques is palming. Look around and notice the level of clarity of your vision at present. Then, simply place the center of your palms over your eyes. Relax your shoulders. You may want to lean forward onto a table or a stack of pillows, to facilitate relaxation. Relax like this for at least two minutes. Then remove your hands, open your eyes, and notice whether anything looks clearer. Usually, it will.

“What you’re doing is you’re letting your hands and your fingers sort of melt into your face. You feel how that affects your whole being as you let that happen. It’s almost like your whole stress system is starting to melt away,” Greg explains.

“Send love and relaxation into your eyes through your palms, which, by the way, are minor chakras, or energy centers. You’re sending all this relaxation into your eyes, and your eyes are relaxing. Imagination becomes very important here, too. You can imagine, pretend, and feel that your eyes are going back toward their natural round shape. Just stay with that as long as you want. And then when you do uncover your eyes, you’re going to see that things are more clear, at least for a moment.

See, this is a setting, a thermostat setting that your body-mind just had for a long time. It may take some practice, some awareness, and gradually learning to sustain this [relaxed state]. It’s kind of a zen thing. You can’t crave it too much because the more you crave it, now you’re trying to force it and now you’re straining again.”

Another technique is called the Bates Long Swing. Begin by simply swaying your body back and forth. The simple act of languidly moving your body, even just a little bit, has a very soothing effect on your brain and thought patterns, and that alone can sometimes help you feel more relaxed during stressful situations. Your eyes also respond. Instead of being locked in a stare, like a deer in headlights, they can begin to relax and move naturally again.

More Information

You can find a lot of information about the Bates Method on the web. The thing to be careful about is that you don’t get drawn into an “eye exercise” approach where you end up straining to get rid of the strain. I think this is the key reason people fail to get results with the Bates Method. Greg’s approach is fantastic for always bringing you back to a relaxed state of mind and body, and helping your eyes feel ready to see clearly again.

You can purchase Greg’s program, Reclaim Your Eyesight Naturally, which consists of six CDs and a 62-page guidebook that helps tie everything together. Just keep in mind that if you are looking for a quick fix, Dr. Bates’ approach is probably not for you. The time required to effect a permanent improvement can vary greatly. In rare cases just a few minutes is sufficient. However, it is often necessary to continue the program for weeks or months, or longer for extreme conditions. Greg also teaches workshops and vision coach trainings, and works with people one-on-one via phone or Skype.

“I’ve heard from hundreds of people that have done my program,” he says. “A lot of people have had stunning success with just the CD program. A lot of others need maybe one session just to get the light bulb to come on. Other people, especially if they’re backed up into a really big prescription, they may need some help unlocking the doors of: why, emotionally, am I stuck here? But it’s amazing what a little EFT, guided visualization, and awareness of tight muscles can do.”

Again, when you have tightness in your eyes, you’re more likely to get eye diseases, and stress is the leading contributor to notachieving full vision recovery. Doing the palming technique is a good foundational step to help release some of that stress and tension held in your eyes. Meditation can also be a helpful strategy, overall.

The Bates Method is really quite simple, yet it requires patience, and some finesse. Remember, the goal is not to “train” or exercise your eyes to make them stronger. The goal is to relax them. Greg’s program provides thorough instructions that can help you get there. Also remember that your mindset is important. With faith in yourself and your body’s self-regenerative ability, the toughest hurdle is learning to relax, so your eyes can function in accord with their natural design.

Few minutes of high intensity interval training burns fat faster than aerobic endurance type exercises by Dr Mercola.

Save your money and make your money work for you so that you can retire with sufficient retirement income where you gain the money you should be paying IRS based on your income tax bracket because of a tax-free investment-retirement plan based on indexing strategies.

The following are the comments in one yahoo news about what $1M can buy you houses in different parts of the world.

• Comment 1: In CA, it’s the quality of the neighborhood that drives housing prices. In upper middle class neighborhoods, you’re paying far more for the land than for the house. In our ‘hood in Mountain View, people buy 50’s and 60’s basic houses on 1/6 acre of land for $1.6M to $1.8M, tear down the house, and build a McMansion.
• Comment 2: In Palo Alto California, 1million is a down payment on a Eichler house built with plywood which the fire dept claims will burn to the ground in less than 15minutes. But then again, you don’t have to worry about being kidnapped for a large ransom, maybe losing some body parts as part of the deal…

—————

Contact Connie Dello Buono 408-854-1883 motherhealth@gmail.com CA Life Lic 0G60621 for investment that is tax-free and uses indexing strategy with no market risk and grows between 8-13% return.

A lot of people have no money for vacation, because they exchange time for money.

In other words, it is not realistic for people to retire and they just die in their job.

Building the business part time, your ticket to never ever having a job or a boss.

Be semi-retired in 2 yrs, make 3-5 times what most people make.

He who writes your check dictates your life.

Is it time to make a change. Join us in helping others as part time business owners, owning your business with no start up capital but with drive to learn how to serve your clients first. We have mentors to help you be a master of influence.

Let me share you this, this is what we found out

It takes 18m to find a job in California, and then lose it again. Create a job and not work processing.

Every day you work hard, you help others reach their dreams.

How many years will your $25k in the bank last if you are 65 yrs old?

You should have your own business, a job of building your dreams where you dictate how much you wanted to get paid.

At 70.5yr, there is a RMD (required min distribution from your retirement plan). A mandatory rule for you to take out your retirement savings plan or a penalty of 80% is set up by the govt. All what is left is $1500 a year to live on. When you sign your 410k or IRA, you are hearded like cattles, by 70.5 yrs of age with RMD.

We will help you as business owner, you do not have to pay franchise fees (no need to spend $70k per yr for a real estate brokerage) and no need for $300k to start as no capital is needed.

The size of your income depends on the size of your VISION.

Blaze your own TRAILS.

To win the RAT race, do not join one. Be a leader. We have a system and business mentors and coaches for you. You can start part time and build slowly.  

The real failure is failing to try. You give yourself zero chance in an opportunity of a lifetime.

Let me help you get out of your first job as there is no need to find a second job.

Be mentored and coached by successful people. You are not alone in your business.

Business mentoring available to all 18k laid off Microsoft employees.